QUOTE(SirAndy @ Jan 24 2022, 12:44 PM)
One is a philosophical question about the passage of time and the inevitable decay of matter, the other is a (intentional) criminal act.
This is why I love this discussion...
- What is the required "passage of time" where this practice is acceptable to you?
- What is the timeline in this particular case? I can only presume, given the accusations of criminal intent, you have proof of that timeline and intent?
- By stating "decay" am I safe in assuming you agree that replacing parts on crashed cars happening quickly counts, in context, as much as wood in a ship rotting over extended time? If not, why not?
- Show me one historical race car that has all of its original bits n pieces. Even better, show me one that does not.
(BTW, you may find that our positions on the practice - for street cars, at least - agree but that our philosophies may not. That's why such philosophical discussions are so fun).
GA
Edit: just read the above reply, where the seller states it's the original chassis. If you guys are correct that many bits are indicating a later chassis, then I admit the above statement approaches a big misunderstanding, if not outright fraud.
Problem with a race car, though, is that there may very well be a good chunck of the chassis that's original but got replaced with later-model bits after crashes. That's where the philosophy comes in: how much of the original is required? Does one non-/6 part in a race car disable it as a /6, even with the original VIN? What if, for example, it was a factory race car that was crashed in 1973 and the factory chose to replace the parts with new parts off the line?