Home  |  Forums  |  914 Info  |  Blogs
 
914World.com - The fastest growing online 914 community!
 
Porsche, and the Porsche crest are registered trademarks of Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG. This site is not affiliated with Porsche in any way.
Its only purpose is to provide an online forum for car enthusiasts. All other trademarks are property of their respective owners.
 

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Interference with shift rod, Interference with shift rod
914racer
post May 22 2025, 02:19 PM
Post #1


Newbie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 4-January 11
From: Cincinnati, OH.
Member No.: 12,564
Region Association: None



I converted a 4 to 6 in a 71. I also have a short shifter and the necessary spacer installed. The shift rod in the tunnel is scraping a gusset and causing a loud squeaking when put in reverse or 1st and slightly less squeak sound going into 4th and 5th. I have a video taken in the tunnel showing how it's interfering with the shift rod. Has anyone else had this issue and have a solution other than drilling a hole with a hole saw on the top of the tunnel and grinding some of the gusset for clearance? Thanks
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
brant
post May 22 2025, 03:00 PM
Post #2


914 Wizard
**********

Group: Members
Posts: 11,969
Joined: 30-December 02
From: Colorado
Member No.: 47
Region Association: Rocky Mountains



we all had to bend the shift rod.

Edit
Re read
Inside the tunnel is likely the seatbelt anchor
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mepstein
post May 22 2025, 03:23 PM
Post #3


914-6 GT in waiting
***************

Group: Members
Posts: 19,919
Joined: 19-September 09
From: Landenberg, PA/Wilmington, DE
Member No.: 10,825
Region Association: MidAtlantic Region



Most common problem is a too long seatbelt bolt that interferes with the rod.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Montreal914
post May 23 2025, 08:44 AM
Post #4


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,833
Joined: 8-August 10
From: Claremont, CA
Member No.: 12,023
Region Association: Southern California



The tail shifter tunnel rod was suported by the rear and front bushing. In its function the rod was rotating on its axis and sliding back and forth (no lateral movement).

The side shiter tunnel rod actually moves left and right at the shifter and pivots in the rear bushing (like a spherical bushing). To allow this left and right motion, the tunnel partial bulkhead through which the rod goes through was enlarged in 73 to allow its lateral movement. Unfortunately, it is very difficult to access that bulkhead to elarge it on the 70-72 cars.

I guess the rod bending trick is the easiest solution. (IMG:style_emoticons/default/smile.gif)

User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
rudedude
post May 23 2025, 09:56 AM
Post #5


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 521
Joined: 1-January 05
From: minneapolis, mn
Member No.: 3,387
Region Association: Upper MidWest



All I had to do was loosen the shifter base and move it a tiny bit. It is probably rubbing on a sheet metal support in the tunnel.
User is online!Profile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
ChrisFoley
post May 23 2025, 12:55 PM
Post #6


I am Tangerine Racing
*****

Group: Members
Posts: 7,989
Joined: 29-January 03
From: Bolton, CT
Member No.: 209
Region Association: None



If I'm not mistaken, the short shifter kit exacerbates the rubbing issue. The spacer is smaller than the length added to the shift lever, which means the rod still sits lower in the tunnel at the front, compared with the stock shifter. Not only that, the distance that the coupler swings left and right is increased by the short shift increased lever arm.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
bdstone914
post May 24 2025, 04:38 PM
Post #7


bdstone914
****

Group: Members
Posts: 4,968
Joined: 8-November 03
From: Riverside CA
Member No.: 1,319



@Montreal914
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)

"The side shiter"
Which models had that?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Montreal914
post May 24 2025, 06:29 PM
Post #8


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,833
Joined: 8-August 10
From: Claremont, CA
Member No.: 12,023
Region Association: Southern California



QUOTE(bdstone914 @ May 24 2025, 03:38 PM) *

@Montreal914
(IMG:style_emoticons/default/happy11.gif)

"The side shiter"
Which models had that?


@bdstone914 I was wondering when you would see it (IMG:style_emoticons/default/laugh.gif)
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
Literati914
post May 25 2025, 11:42 AM
Post #9


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,943
Joined: 16-November 06
From: Dallas, TX
Member No.: 7,222
Region Association: Southwest Region



Tail shift transmissions being replaced with side shiFFter transmissions are a common thing - never heard of any tunnel interference (IMG:style_emoticons/default/idea.gif) . Is this issue only because a short shifter kit is installed? Anyone experiencing this without the kit?

Mine (a '72 w/ side shift) takes a little more effort to get into 1/R than I remember but I was thinking it's because every shift bushing has been replaced. Think I'll see if sliding the top plate over slightly, as suggested, will improve it.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gandalf_025
post May 26 2025, 04:20 PM
Post #10


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,494
Joined: 25-June 09
From: North Shore, Massachusetts
Member No.: 10,509
Region Association: North East States



Many years ago I put a 1965, 911 engine in my 6…

Talk about shift rod interference..
I was lucky and the shop I was doing the swap in had a shift rod
that was modified by the previous owner..

Here is an original and the modified one..

Attached Image
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
worn
post May 26 2025, 07:59 PM
Post #11


Winner of the Utah Twisted Joint Award
****

Group: Members
Posts: 3,486
Joined: 3-June 11
From: Madison, WI
Member No.: 13,152
Region Association: Upper MidWest



QUOTE(gandalf_025 @ May 26 2025, 02:20 PM) *

Many years ago I put a 1965, 911 engine in my 6…

Talk about shift rod interference..
I was lucky and the shop I was doing the swap in had a shift rod
that was modified by the previous owner..

Here is an original and the modified one..

Attached Image

Which one is factory?
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
gandalf_025
post May 27 2025, 02:42 AM
Post #12


Senior Member
***

Group: Members
Posts: 1,494
Joined: 25-June 09
From: North Shore, Massachusetts
Member No.: 10,509
Region Association: North East States



Straight one is the factory one.
The early aluminum engine cases
stuck further down than the he later mag cases.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
mate914
post May 27 2025, 06:02 AM
Post #13


Matt
***

Group: Members
Posts: 859
Joined: 27-February 09
From: Eagles mere, PA
Member No.: 10,102
Region Association: North East States



QUOTE(mepstein @ May 22 2025, 05:23 PM) *

Most common problem is a too long seatbelt bolt that interferes with the rod.


Yes very true.
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post
zoomCat
post May 31 2025, 10:30 AM
Post #14


Member
**

Group: Members
Posts: 200
Joined: 13-August 04
From: Cincinnati, OH
Member No.: 2,526
Region Association: None



Here is some info on what the geometry in the tunnel looks like, and what the side shift conversion looks like. I fixed my issue when the floor pans were off, but that might be a bit extreme.

http://www.914world.com/bbs2/index.php?sho...=373723&hl=
User is offlineProfile CardPM
Go to the top of the page
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



- Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 2nd June 2025 - 07:04 AM